What is Defect Life Cycle in Software Testing with Example

Introduction
In software development, defects (or bugs) are inevitable.Understanding the Defect Life Cycle is essential not only for testers but also for developers and project managers, as it ensures the delivery of high-quality software.
In this guide, we will understand in detail the "defect life cycle in software testing," the "stages of the defect life cycle," tools for defect life cycle, real-life examples, and how to track defects efficiently.
Understanding the Concept
The Defect Life Cycle is also known as the Bug Life Cycle.Defect life cycle is a process in which defect goes through different stages in its entire life. It starts when a defect is found and ends when a defect is closed, after ensuring it's not reproduced. Defect life cycle is related to the bug found during testing.
Why Defect Life Cycle is Crucial in Software Testing
The Defect Life Cycle is extremely important in software testing because it helps in:- Maintaining software quality
- Tracking progress
- Ensuring accountability regarding who is assigned to a specific bug
- Ensuring unresolved bugs do not make it to production
Stages of the Defect Life Cycle in Software Testing

- New
During the testing phase, if a tester or the testing team discovers a new bug, they log it as 'New' in the defect tracking system.
Remember, bugs of this type - when logged for the first time automatically fall into the 'New' state.
- Assigned
Once a bug has been logged and assigned to the appropriate developer within the development team, its status changes to the "Assigned" stage.
- Open or Active or In Progress
Now, in this state, the developer begins analyzing the bug, and the stage transitions from "Assigned" to "Open."
Developers now have three options available to them, in addition to simply resolving the issue:
- Deferred - If the developer determines that the bug is not of high priority, or that it does not pertain to the current release and can be resolve in next release, they set the status to "Deferred".
The "Deferred" status is also referred to as the "Postponed state".
- Duplicate - If the same bug is reported twice or if it is essentially the same issue or concept, such that resolving one instance would effectively eliminate the other or if the bug had been raised previously and subsequently closed, then the developer marks it as "Duplicate" stage.
- Rejected - If the developer determines that this is not an genuine bug, or if the bug cannot be reproduced upon analysis, they set its status to "Rejected".
So, the developer has options to reject are Duplicate Defect, NOT a Defect, or Non-Reproducible.
- Deferred - If the developer determines that the bug is not of high priority, or that it does not pertain to the current release and can be resolve in next release, they set the status to "Deferred".
- Fixed
If none of these conditions are met, then the developer needs to resolve the bug.
After making the necessary changes and bug fixes in the code, the developer hands it over to the testing team and sets the status to "Fixed".
- Re-testing
This stage is also referred to as 'Pending Request'.
The testing team will now begin retesting this bug and mark the stage as "Re-testing". And the testing team tests whether the bug has been truly resolved or not.
- Re-open - The tester performs a test, if a bug is detected and has not been resolved, they reopen it. This stage is marked as "Re-open" and the same defect lifecycle resumes, though the "New" stage is skipped in this cycle.
- Re-open - The tester performs a test, if a bug is detected and has not been resolved, they reopen it. This stage is marked as "Re-open" and the same defect lifecycle resumes, though the "New" stage is skipped in this cycle.
- Verified
It is also referred to as 'Ready to Close'.
In this stage, the tester checks whether the bug has been fixed or not, and whether the bug fix has affected other models(Regression Testing).
If everything good, the tester marks this stage as "Verified".
- Closed
This state means that the bug is fixed, tested and approved.
If the bug passes the "Re-testing" and "Verified" stages, then the issue of this bug can now be closed and this stage is marked as "Closed".
Popular Defect Tracking Tools for Software Testing
Defect tracking tools also known as Bug Tracking Tools assist testing teams in efficiently identifying and managing defects throughout the entire development process.Utilizing the right tool enhances product quality, improves product quality, team collaboration and project delivery timelines.
Listed below are some of the most popular tools currently in use.
- JIRA
License: Open-source / Paid
This is a very popular bug-tracking tool and is used in Agile project management.
Pros- Highly customizable workflows
- Strong reporting & dashboards
- Great integrations (Jenkins, Bitbucket)
- Can be complex for beginners
- Expensive for large teams
- Bugzilla
License: Open-source
This tool is highly reliable for small and medium-sized teams developed by Mozilla.
Pros- Free and stable
- Advanced search & reporting
Cons- Oudated UI
- Setup not be easily
- MantisBT
License: Open-source
A lightweight web based bug tracking system.
Pros- Easy to set up
- Lightweight and fast
- Limited advanced features
- Basic interface
There are many other Bug Tracking Tools available such as Redmine, YouTrack, Azure DevOps (Boards), Trello, Zoho BugTracker, GitHub, and GitLab Issues each with its own set of pros and cons, moreover most of them are paid or commercial license.
Advantages of Defect Life Cycle in Software Testing
The Defect Life Cycle offers numerous benefits to the testing process some of these are listed below.- Clear Tracking of Defects - It provides a structured framework for tracking defects ensuring that nothing is missed or ignored.
- Improved Communication - Team collaboration among testers, developers and managers is highly beneficial, as it provides significant assistance and ensures that the status of every defect is known.
- Better Prioritization of Defects - This helps the team identify which defects are critical and which are not and determine which ones need to be resolved first.
- Accountability in Team Members - Every defect is assigned to a specific team member, ensuring that responsibilities remain clear.
- Improved Project Management - The manager can effectively monitor and understand the project specifically, how many bugs are open, how many have been fixed and how many remain pending.
Every defect follows a specific stage, so issues are resolved quickly and efficiently.
Disadvantages of Defect Life Cycle in Software Testing
While there are so many benefits, the Bug Life Cycle also has a few limitations.- Time Consuming Process - If the defect lifecycle is not managed properly, unneccessary delays occur at every stage, slowing down the process.
- Complex Workflow - The numerous stages make the process complicated for beginners.
- Dependency on Team Communication - If developers and testers do not communicate effectively with each other, defect resolution may be delayed or subject to misunderstandings.
- Not Suitable for Very Small Projects - For very small projects, the defect life cycle is extremely time consuming and causes unnecessary delays.
Conclusion
The Defect Life Cycle in Software Testing (also called the Bug Life Cycle) is a process to identify the various stages through which the defect travels from the time it is reported to the time it is closed.Bug Lifecycle ( Bug Flow) A bug is assigned as 'New' to the developer, analyzed and then marked as 'Open' or 'Fixed / Deferred / Dupe / Not a Bug'.
After fixing the defect, testing team retests the defect and verifies the fix done by the developer, if the issue is fixed they close the defect.
This process helps maintain software quality, ensures accountability and improves team communication.
Popular tools like Jira, Bugzilla and MantisBT assist in managing defects effectively.
The Bug Life Cycle is a great way to track issues, prioritize your work and manage your projects. However, it can be very time-consuming to use and is not appropriate for new users.
Managing the Bug Life Cycle can be very complex and it is therefore not recommended for tiny projects.
Frequently Asked Questions(FAQs)
What is the difference between Bug Life Cycle and Defect Life Cycle
The Bug Life Cycle and the Defect Life Cycle are essentially the same, the process is identical the only difference lies in the terminology.
Both serve to track and manage software issues.
Bug is terminology of Coder/Developer
Defect is terminology of TesterWhy is the Defect Life Cycle important in Software Testing
The Defect Life Cycle have very importance in Software Testing.
It ensures that software quality is maintained, facilitates the tracking of progress, establishes accountability among team members, and prevents unresolved bugs from reaching the production environment thereby ensuring that the software remains stable and reliable.What are the key stages of the Defect Life Cycle
Major Stages in the Defect Life Cycle: New, Assigned, Open or Active, Fixed, Verified and Closed.
Optional stages are include Rejected, Duplicate, Deferred, or Re-open, depending on the workflow.Can a Bug be reopened in the Defect Life Cycle
Yes, if a bug re-occur even after having reached the 'Fixed' or 'Closed' stage the defect is reopened and reassigned. This ensures that no bugs remain within the software or make their way into production.What are the most popular Defect Tracking Tools in Software Testing
The most widely used defect tracking tools are JIRA, Bugzilla, MantisBT, Redmine, YouTrack, Azure DevOps (Boards), Trello, Zoho BugTracker, GitHub, GitLab Issues and Trac.How do Defect Tracking Tools improve Software Testing
Defect tracking tools facilitate team collaboration, bug prioritization and the generation of detailed reports, while also providing clear workflow visibility consequently, this enhances software quality and improves delivery times through faster release cycles.What is the Defect Life Cycle in Different Testing Types
The Defect Life Cycle is essentially the same for all types of testing, there is only a slight variation depending on the specific purpose or type of testing.
Apart from this, all the stages remain identical.Does the Test Lead or Reporting Manager review every bug in the Defect Life Cycle
No, this is practically impossible, and the Test Lead or Reporting Manager does not review every bug.
Review only if it is there is a critical bug, otherwise they don't.How to Explain Defect Life Cycle in Interviews
The Defect Life Cycle is a systematic process that involves identifying, tracking, fixing and verifying defects to ensure that software quality remains high and stable.
Following this, you should explain definitions and all the stages involved, step by step.